home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT1253>
- <title>
- Mar. 22, 1993: If Not the Jetsons, What?
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Mar. 22, 1993 Can Animals Think
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- TELEVISION, Page 64
- If Not the Jetsons, What?
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>Educational shows will work only if everyone stops treating
- them like spinach
- </p>
- <p>By RICHARD ZOGLIN--With reporting by Elizabeth L. Bland/New
- York and Patrick E. Cole/Los Angeles
- </p>
- <p> In the world of children's TV, the bad guys and good guys
- are easy to tell apart. The bad guys, everybody knows, are
- local TV stations that try to pass off cartoon shows like G.I.
- Joe and The Jetsons as "educational." The good guys are kindly
- kids' show hosts like Shari Lewis, who brought her puppet Lamb
- Chop to Washington last week to help plead for better
- children's programming. "We need the best you grownups have to
- offer," the sock puppet testified before a House subcommittee.
- "If you give it to us, we will give the good stuff back."
- </p>
- <p> A little background while glucose levels return to normal.
- </p>
- <p> After years of neglect, children's TV is once again
- getting close scrutiny from the Federal Government. Under a
- provision of the Children's Television Act of 1990, stations are
- required to air at least some programming that serves the
- "educational and informational needs" of children. The trick,
- of course, is figuring out what constitutes educational fare.
- A number of stations tried to satisfy the rules by putting a
- fresh coat of public-service paint on rusty old entertainment
- shows. Among the programs thrust under the education rubric,
- according to a study by the Washington-based Center for Media
- Education, were Super Mario Brothers (cited for demonstrating
- the importance of "self-confidence"), The Jetsons (for teaching
- kids what life might be like in the 21st century) and Leave It
- to Beaver (for promoting the values of "communication and
- trust").
- </p>
- <p> Such creative bookkeeping didn't sit well with the Federal
- Communications Commission, which announced that it was delaying
- the license renewal of seven stations because of their record
- on children's programming. The agency also narrowed its
- definition of educational fare to exclude entertainment shows
- that simply have positive social themes. The House hearings last
- week ratchetted up the pressure another notch. Representative
- Edward Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, produced the requisite
- sound bite: "Children's TV on commercial broadcast television
- today remains the video equivalent of a Twinkie."
- </p>
- <p> Producers and stations are now grappling with the problem
- of how to get some more spinach into the diet--and, just as
- important, how to get kids to eat it. A batch of informational
- shows on the syndication market are drawing renewed attention.
- They include Beakman's World, a lighthearted science program
- featuring a frizzy-haired Mr. Wizard, currently seen on 225
- stations; Scratch, a magazine-style show aimed at teens, airing
- on 110 stations; and Real News for Kids, a Turner Broadcasting
- production carried on 210. NBC has a new Saturday-morning entry
- in the field: Name Your Adventure, in which kids are given a
- chance to live out fantasies. The Children's Television
- Workshop, which gave birth to Big Bird for PBS, is developing
- an animated show for ABC next fall based on David Macaulay's
- book The Way Things Work.
- </p>
- <p> But such shows are struggling to find an audience. Many of
- the syndicated offerings are being run in little-watched time
- periods, often before 7 a.m. "The demand isn't there yet to
- produce programming of this nature," says Barry Thurston,
- president of Columbia Pictures Television Distribution, which
- syndicates Beakman's World. "This is not an area where a
- producer is going to make a lot of money." The government can
- legislate more air time for educational TV, argues John Miller,
- executive vice president of NBC Entertainment, but "whether kids
- will watch those shows is another question."
- </p>
- <p> The kidvid crackdown has its troublesome aspects. For one
- thing, the rules apply only to broadcasting stations--not to
- cable channels, which can continue to lure young viewers with
- all the cartoons they want. The creation of a new category of
- educational fare, moreover, may simply ghettoize such
- programming and turn kids off. The very notion of educational
- TV often seems to reflect narrow, schoolmarmish notions.
- Live-action shows are almost automatically preferred over
- cartoons, and some sweetly innocent shows, like Barney and
- Friends, seem to win approval largely because they shelter kids
- from the rude real world--a strange notion of education
- indeed.
- </p>
- <p> But this is a children's story, and the good guys get the
- last word. Peggy Charren, the veteran kidvid activist, notes
- that educational shows rarely get high ratings because they
- must be geared toward specific age groups; that is why
- government monitoring must supplement the marketplace. "It's a
- bloody shame," she says, "that in a country as rich and
- achieving as this one, you had to drag the broadcasters kicking
- and screaming to serve children." Now, perhaps, the kicking may
- subside and the serving will start.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-